
While it is not often heard of in today's society, it is something that is a possibility. Therefore, I believe that it is important to hold the ethical discussion of medical emancipation before it becomes a major issue in society.
First of all, it is necessary to clarify that medical emancipation is not the same thing as actual emancipation. Medical emancipation is not a child looking to live away from their parents or being out from their jurisdiction completely. Instead, medical emancipation is strictly removing medical jurisdiction from the parents and giving it to the child.
In most cases, medical emancipation would not be at all necessary. After all how many children are actually forced to go through medical procedures without their consent? However, this could be a possible scenario for a very sick child who is tired of having their quality of life decrease because of the constant experimentation with procedures trying to cure the incurable. In this instance, if the parents are unwilling to allow the child to enjoy the amount of time - whether large or small - they have left, medical emancipation may be a possibility. Now that we see how medical emancipation could be applied in a scenario different from that of Anna and Kate, it is necessary to consult the moral aspects of medical emancipation.

To this I respond that God gives free will. We have the free will to choose to love God or not, to do the right thing or not. Therefore, if parents are wrongly making a child go through with medical procedures without their consent or best benefit in mind, medical emancipation is a moral option. However, if the parents are acting with the child's best interests in mind and according to the will of God, the child must remain under control of their parents.
'
No comments:
Post a Comment